A boardroom review is a method that allows a table to evaluate its performance in a thorough manner. It assists tables in identifying aspects of longevity, as and weaknesses in their connections, leadership relationships and their culture that could lead to changes in both the social and practical aspects. It also helps ensure that the table members who pay for table membership boardroombook.com/guide-to-board-succession-planning/ are able to perform their roles.

This research area is in development and there remain many challenges. The evidence available at present shows diverse results on how dissent can affect boards and their functioning. Certain studies show positive (Zona 2016) curvilinear, not significant, or mixed results. Others find negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. There are 2012) connections between dissent and the task performance of a board.

The literature does not offer a deeper understanding of what factors influence the dynamics of dissension. Future research should create an integrated theoretical framework to contextualize this governance phenomenon. This could include the use of configuring approaches (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018; Schiell, Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers more precisely understand how individual board attributes as well as processes and contexts connect to the need for and sufficient causality in governance processes.

Finally, a number of studies employ the definition of dissent as narrow and do not disclose precise measurements. These studies are therefore susceptible to measurement errors. Therefore, it would be worthwhile for future studies to develop more robust and precise methods for measuring dissent.